Testimonials

“… it [the tool] was very clear to me. I really like the explanations that include examples.”

“Congratulations. This tool is fantastic. It will help me guide my patrons responsibly.”

“I was considering systematic vs. scoping reviews and this solidified my view.”

“Really interesting tool! Currently doing a scoping review so it confirmed my approach.”

“Very useful to get links to methods and reporting guidelines!”

“This tool is very useful in the context of evidence to inform decision making in public health institutions, especially with the time constraints.”

“The accompanying additional information sheet explaining concepts was useful where questions were unclear.”

"Thank you for developing this useful tool. It could help students realise different types of review methods and their guidelines."

"Straightforward and easy to use."

“Excelente herramienta. (Great tool. – Spanish (Google Translate))”

"I am working with an honours student and this tool was a wonderful teaching tool to help focus our discussion on the synthesis project."

"The E&E guide is a critical addition to the tool questions. Thank you."

"It is a good tool to understand what kind of review is needed"

"I had decided on a scoping review - it was helpful to have a sense that this was the best method as I haven’t completed one before, and also to have the suggestion of a rapid review."

“As a librarian, it was very clear to me. I really like the explanations that include examples. I chose identify/clarify based on the idea I had in mind and this made my results much more targeted. Just having an answer for the type of work I am looking for really makes a difference."

“I am so happy to find this tool because I was in the process to prepare a presentation on how to choose a right review and this is a great source adding more value to my presentation. Focusing on scoping reviews, I also enjoy reading articles written by Dr. Tricco. Thanks a lot."